<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DeVos: Intelligent Design is a &#8220;viable alternative theory.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grpundit.com/2006/09/21/devos-intelligent-design-is-a-viable-alternative-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grpundit.com/2006/09/21/devos-intelligent-design-is-a-viable-alternative-theory/</link>
	<description>Politics &#124; Economics &#124; Society &#124; Grand Rapids, Michigan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankNemecek</title>
		<link>http://www.grpundit.com/2006/09/21/devos-intelligent-design-is-a-viable-alternative-theory/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankNemecek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grpundit.com/2006/09/21/devos-intelligent-design-is-a-viable-alternative-theory/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Amen!  Intelligent design doesn&#039;t belong in a science class.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is a major set-back for DeVos&#039; candidacy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.GreatLakesPolitics.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!  Intelligent design doesn&#8217;t belong in a science class.</p>
<p>This is a major set-back for DeVos&#8217; candidacy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.GreatLakesPolitics.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.GreatLakesPolitics.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

